|
Comment on Scott-Moncrieff; Gonzales.
| go to full Report Inquiry Scott-Moncrieff; Gonzaleslink has collapsed - try the whole list of South-East SHA Inquiries -Gonzales
Care has gone horribly wrong, despite reasonably good contact with secondary mental health service. The principal failure is an insufficent conviction that his illness, A diagnosis of schizophrenia , verified in hospital as responding to medication, AND as relapsing whilst tried in hospital without it, is never fully accepted subsequently. The illness is not florid nor observed in subsequent professional inerviews as substantial. The care and treatment consequently is inadequate, as the illness is insufficiently engaged. Because the illness is not expressed flagrantly, and there is no story of violence or resentment, it is not thought to be capable of becoming at risk. Medication is not given the attention it warrants for this condition, because the lack of conviction about the diagnosis,as together with the lack of illness behaviour at contact, reduced the seriousness with which he was addressed.
Schizophrenia is sufficiently a risk illness, what is going on being often kept within the mind of the patient, who dos not reveal the inner world, or cannot do so, that thorough consideration to discovering and prescribing medication that is acceptable to the long run, must always be sought, The other necessity requiring serious attention, for without it medication is not taken seriously enough by the patient [ what's the point ] , is the delivery of an aftercare programme which provides hope and some level of success in allowing the sufferer, an occupational outlet of meaning for his future living. There is a long and worthwhile list of comments on a 'Recovery' programme from Para 11.00 [ engagement ] to para 11.22 onwards 'the recovery model' go to full Report Inquiry Scott-Moncrieff; Gonzales
That is the most telling comment. It is time the services to this illness, schizophrenaia, were given their own specific examination. Are there somewhere , Mental Health Trusts who can be exemplars of and comparitors forf good service - successes with this illness in a whole catchment area - not a selected few patients - that can be the guide? Does anybody know of any ? The final tragedy is preceded by G. running out of the house, naked through the streets, reported to the police by the man living in the house, but through misunderstanding, a failure to connect up following that, to an appropriate response services. There seems not to have been a fail-safe, fall-back preparation of a procedure that would have taken G back into specialist mental health service care.
|